Is State Tax Rates Hiking Up The Price Of Vaporizers?

The U.S. tobacco industry is fighting back against efforts by state regulatory bodies and consumers to modify the sale of electronic cigarettes. While vaporizers have already been around for quite some time and are becoming more acceptable in mainstream American life, the tobacco companies are determined to fight these efforts vigorously. They’ve made millions of dollars trying to defeat state taxing and regulation efforts. Now, they’re making their next move: challenging the legality of the taxation themselves. In a fresh legal filing, they’re claiming that the FDA over regulates and creates a “guaranteed” interstate transportation business. The filing happens to be being contested in the courts, and both sides expect an answer at some point soon.

vaping online

State taxation uprights vaporizers by regulating their sale. It’s estimated that about twenty states have uprights to market vaporizer devices, including California, Colorado, D.C., Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Washington. These states have become rapidly in recent years, so when a consequence, their cigarette tax rates are also growing rapidly. Several same states likewise have placed taxes on cigar and pipe tobacco. It appears that smoking just gets more expensive, and that’s what the tobacco industry is shooting for.

Based on the filing with the FDA, the tobacco industry has been targeted unfairly. The tobacco industry is doing everything they can to fight regulation of vaporizer devices. As we’ve seen, the U.S. Supreme Court has multiple times ruled contrary to the FDA over-regulation of cigarettes. These rulings have left the door spacious to regulation of vaporizer devices. The FDA claims that this over-regulation defeats the purpose of regulating and controlling the usage of vaporizers.

The fact is that the FDA itself isn’t even required to regulate or control these industries. Only state governments have that authority. It is the state governments that impose their very own taxes, and many states have imposed increased taxes in an effort to try to curb smoking. But the state governments are themselves at a disadvantage. They cannot regulate wholesale prices since these prices are regulated by state laws. In addition they can’t tax the merchandise at a higher rate than the federal government does.

Also, the FDA itself isn’t directly mixed up in manufacturing of the Juul Compatible Pods vaporizer. Tobacco companies manufacture their very own products, and they are those that get sued by the states and levied taxes. The FDA merely approves or denies manufacturer licenses based upon whether these manufacturers follow federal law. And when the manufacturer doesn’t, then your company doesn’t get its license.

So, the states that do impose taxes on vaporizer devices do not get the advantage of having a federal regulator, or a manufacturer that is licensed by the state. So, instead, they find ways to increase taxes on the manufactures themselves! Which makes no sense. Why are these manufacturers being targeted specifically? There is no real reason.

The Food and Drug Administration is the federal body responsible for regulating pharmaceuticals, health supplements and cosmetics. It gets the power to ban the production or sale of any chemical or substance that it determines is unsafe. So, why are states attempting to tell the FDA to target Vaping online users rather than tobacco manufacturers? The FDA knows that regulating diet pills isn’t going to work because you can find no controlled weight loss supplements currently out there. And, even if there were, they couldn’t force food manufacturers to market diet pills containing things that are banned by state law.

So, instead, the states want to force the FDA to come up with some kind of rule or regulation which will require a manufacturer to sell their devices in a specific manner, in accordance with state regulations. That makes no sense at all. It also flies when confronted with the original purpose of the Food Drug and Administration Act. Why the FDA is targeting these devices is really a question that only experts in the FDA can answer.